Microscopic View of the Equilibrium Constant

The chemical potential
can be expressed in terms of the partition function:
To
see this we first expand lnQj, starting with the fact that Qj
= qjNj/Nj!,
![]()
and then take the
derivative with respect to Nj,

This result indicates
that

If this expression is
substituted into Eqn. 1 we have

or

We can express the
concentration dependence in the equilibrium constant as

where
rj is the number density of
species j, rj
= Nj/V.

which shows that the equilibrium constant can be expressed in terms of molecular partition functions.
In
considering the molecular partition function we must consider the kinematic
contributions and electronic contributions.
In other words if we write the molecular partition function as
,
the
molecular motions, translation, rotation and vibration are kinematic
contributions to the available energy space. The electronic partition function is somewhat different since it
represents the binding energy of a molecule with respect to constituent atoms. Until now we have simply stated that qelec
= gelec the electronic degeneracy.
This is equivalent to ignoring the energetic contributions to chemical
bonds and treating molecules as translating, rotating and vibrating collections
of nuclei that are held together by bonds.
However, when we deal with chemical reactions there are, by definition
changes in bonding. We can accommodate this
writing
![]()
where
D0 represents the binding energy as shown in Figure below. First consider a quantum chemical
calculation of the potential energy of the CO molecule shown in Figure below.

In
this example, the equilibrium energy De is obtained from a quantum
chemical calculation of the binding energy of CO as shown in Figure below.

The
binding energy D0 is equal to the equilibrium energy De
shown in the figure minus the zero point energy.
D0
= De – hn/2
The
zero point energy is shown as the red stripe at the bottom. For CO this energy is calculated to be 1067
cm-1 and De is –96,545 cm-1. Thus, the zero point energy is typically a
small correction since De is –95,581 in this case.
By
making this subtraction we also “remove” the zero point energy from the
vibrational partition function. The
vibrational partition function that we have considered up to now is:

The
term in the numerator represents the zero point energy. When this term is incorporated into qelec
the vibration partition function becomes.
![]()
In
this form we can state that for a singly degenerate vibration qvib =
1 at T = 0 K and the magnitude of the vibrational partition function increases
with temperature. Using this separation
the significance of the kinematic partition functions is clear. These represent the temperature dependence
of occupation of various levels, translation, rotation and vibration,
respectively. The electronic partition
function, on the other hand, represents the energy of stabilization of the
molecule with respect to its constituent atoms. In fact qelec approaches infinity as T ŕ 0 K.
What sense does this make? Well,
if we consider qelec as a contribution to an equilibrium constant we
can think of temperature as a parameter that determines the relative stability
of the molecule. The bound state of the
molecule will be most favored at T = 0 K.
As temperature increases there is some thermal tendency for the molecule
to dissociate (even though this is small at most temperatures of interest to
chemists). In this sense qelec
is quite different from the kinematic partition functions.